Craving cappuccino?

OK, if you ever come to Rome and are a cappuccino lover, you absolutely must go to the Bar delle Grazie, just between St Peter’s and the Vatican Museums. It’s in the “Borgo”, on Via delle Grazie. Best foam, nice and hot (though some people purposely order it tepid here. Now that I just don’t understand). Just the right strength, high quality milk, Illy coffee, sprinkle of cocoa on top, often in pretty shapes like hearts or leaves… Cappuccino heaven.  Yesterday I discovered they also make homemade cake in the afternoons. The spongy American kind, with either chocolate chips or orange juice mixed in.

Cultural differences: During Mass, at least in my experience in the States and in England, the parishioners normally stand up to go to Communion row by row, pew by pew. Yeah, that doesn’t happen here. People just sort of stand up and flock towards the front.

Speaking of pews, in some churches here they have kneelers where the cushioney part is on a hinge, and you lift it up in order to put your feet on the bare wood while you’re sitting. Good stuff. Is that an Italian thing?

“The apparel oft proclaims the man” – Hamlet, 1.3

Today I was wondering why, most commonly, the British say “smart” to refer to someone who’s elegantly dressed, whereas Americans use it to say that a person is intelligent. I found this in an online etymology dictionary:

Smart: late O.E. smeart “sharp, severe, stinging,” related to smeortan (see smart (v.)). Meaning “quick, active, clever” is attested from c.1300, probably from the notion of “cutting” wit, words, etc.; meaning “trim in attire” first attested 1718, “ascending from the kitchen to the drawing-room c.1880.” [Weekley] In ref. to devices, “behaving as though guided by intelligence” (e.g. smart bomb) first attested 1972. Smarts “good sense, intelligence,” is first recorded 1968. Smart aleck is from 1865, perhaps in allusion to Aleck Hoag, notorious pimp, thief, and confidence man in New York City in early 1840s. Smart cookie is from 1948; smarty-pants first attested 1941.

OK, I’ve read the word smart so many times now that it’s starting to look completely foreign. Though the preference of each of the cultures to use one significance much more than the other is still a mystery.

While I was on that site, I decided to look up an expression I’ve had a theory about for a long time. When we read Hamlet for an English class, I wondered if the phrase “he’s such a ham” might have derived from Shakespeare’s dramatic enquirer of the famous “to be or not to be?”. I was wrong. Here’s what they say:

Ham: “overacting performer,” 1882 Amer.Eng., apparently a shortening of hamfatter (1880) “actor of low grade,” said to be from an old minstrel show song, “The Ham-fat Man” (1863). The song itself, a black-face number, has nothing to do with acting, so the connection must be with the quality of acting in minstrel shows, where the song was popular. The notion of “amateurish” led to the sense of “amateur radio operator” (1919). The verb in the performance sense is first recorded 1933.

Update: Great news! My favorite gelateria has reopened! They sure had me scared for a while there.

Flying forks and spicy sweets

This particular sweet shop has enjoyed fame since it was featured in a classic Italian movie by Nanni Moretti, my friend Giusi explained to me as she led the way there. “So that’s how they pull off their exorbitant prices,” I replied, as I had always avoided the place after one look at the shop window. But she insisted it was worth a trip inside because of their diavoletti, chocolates with hot pepper.  So we entered and got one chocolate each. And she was right. Perfect balance between spicy and sweet.

As we ate, Giusi struck up a conversation with the woman at the cashier, who looked to be in her 80’s. An old framed photograph of her smiling from behind the counter was up on the wall, along with a great many others, mostly of extremely ornate cakes and sweets shaped into all kinds of things. Though Giusi sought to discover the hidden secrets of the pastry shop’s best sweets, or at least a shred of advice as to what might be especially delicious, she didn’t get far.

Allora, cos’è il vostro punto forte?“, she asked. (Punto forte is a strength, a specialty) “Punto forte? We don’t have one,” the woman replied brusquely. Silence. “I had thought they might be these ‘diavoletti…”, Giusi continued. “We don’t have one particular strength. What would we be if we did?”, the woman continued, raising her voice with conviction. “That would be like being a singer who could only sing one song beautifully. One cannot be considered truly talented in something just because he can do one aspect of it well. We cater to our customers, so what they buy more of, we sell more of, but it’s not because it’s our best product”.  We had been told.

As a side note, though, the second chocolate I tried wasn’t nearly as nice as that diavoletto. They’ve got that one down.

After sitting down at a cafè for drinks, Giusi and I kept walking, past the Villa Farnesina. Giusi lit up, and proceeded to explain that the place was full of gorgeous frescoes, an extremely elegant palace that used to host posh parties. Apparently, the man who threw these parties, a financier from Siena called Agostino Chigi, liked to keep up his reputation as being extravagantly rich and carefree, so at the end of meals he would have his servants clear the tables by hurling the golden silverware into the river. (The festivities took place in a pavilion that he had built on the river bank, which no longer stands). Of course, Giusi explained, Chigi had had underwater nets placed in the river so as to retrieve them all after the lavish entertainment was good and finished.

Confession: the above story is a bit of a combination of what Giusi recounted and what my new Rome guide book says. It’s extremely detailed (almost 700 pages!) and a local bookshop owner recommended it for people who either live here or have a great deal of time to look around. It’s just called Rome, by Mauro, Paola, Eric and Jack Lucentini. Mauro is a Roman journalist who’s worked as a foreign correspondent, Paola is his late wife, an art historian, and Eric and Jack are their sons (a history student and reporter, consecutively). I’ve hardly looked at it yet but am looking forward to learning the stories that so many of these walls and buildings stand waiting to tell.

Shake a tail feather

“Love is blind.

God is love.

Ray Charles is blind.

Therefore, Ray Charles must be God.”

-Vinicio Capossela, Italian musical artist

There’s some flawless logic for ya. Can’t say I’m a huge Ray Charles fan, but I still think it’s worth a chuckle.

Juggling, ants and ginseng

  • Baby Jesus is growing up! The ‘bambinello’ in the St Peter’s Square nativity scene has become a smiling toddler, and he’s moved from the manger to Mary’s lap. Perhaps it’s  a welcome reminder of what Michelle Martin discussed in her latest column of ”The Family Room“:

“This is where the church, I think, gets it right, when so much of the culture gets it wrong. This is still the Christmas season, never mind that you won’t find anything about Christmas in a store until, say, next September. … This is the time Mary would have stayed with the baby, feeding and caring for him and helping him thrive” (Catholic New World, 17 Jan. 2010).

  • Do they have ginseng coffee in the States? It’s become pretty popular here, if still somewhat uncommon as an order. Whether or not it will be tasty is a complete gamble, depending on the brand the cafe uses, but it can be really delicious when done right. Plus it’s supposed to have 15% of the caffeine. I’m trying not to be excessively dependent on my daily espressos…

  • The girl who threw herself at the Pope on Christmas Eve came to the General Audience this Wednesday with her parents, and apologized to him. The apology comes after the pardon had already been granted, though, since back on the 26th Benedict had sent his personal secretary to visit her in the psychiatric clinic and tell her he forgave her.
  • My favorite gelateria is still closed! I’m starting to get severely worried.
  • I just figured out another English expression that actually works when translated: what doesn’t kill you,  makes you stronger. “Se non uccide, fortifica“. Thanks for that, Tiziano Ferro. (Warning: If you click the link, be prepared for a highly dramatic breakup song).
  • While waiting for the bus, many people smoke, talk on their cell phones, or sometimes read. Here it’s not too unusual to see Religious praying the rosary as they wait. Less common, however, is the opportunity that I had recently: to see a nun, in full habit, practicing her juggling at the bus stop!
  • The other day I learned from an online Yale psychology lecture that we actually create word divisions in our heads as we’re listening to someone talk.  So that’s why if you listen to a new language it sounds as if they’re all just a bunch of words jumbled together that make no sense, or as if people are speaking really quickly. It’s only when you know a language’s vocab that you start to make the separations in your mind.
  • I like opening up to the Bible’s Book of Proverbs sometimes.  It’s fun how it’s mainly just a big list of tidbits of advice. They don’t usually lead naturally from one to the next; there may as well be bullet points in front of almost every other verse. Apparently, the author really loathes laziness (ex. ch. 6, 19 and 20) but likes whispering (18:8).

A few that I enjoyed:

“A friend loves at all times, and kinsfolk are born to share adversity” (17:17).

“The human mind may devise many plans, but it is the purpose of the Lord that will be established” (19:21).

“Go to the ant, you lazybones; consider its ways, and be wise” (6:6).  I’ve been thinking quite a bit lately about how we’re supposed to become like “little ones”, as it says in Matthew, but I hadn’t thought to go that small!

Education: The bigger picture

Last month I got to cover the Pope’s Vespers celebration with university students. Here’s the resulting piece. For some context, see Benedict’s Homily for the occasion.

To seek wisdom is to seek Christ

“We students have to seek the Face of God in everything we study”. With these words Emanuele Raimondo, a law student in Rome, took up a central theme of Benedict XVI’s Homily to students on 17 December. “It is our vocation to search for wisdom, that is, for God”, Raimondo continued. The academic’s role is then to help reveal the Face of Christ to others in “intellectual charity”, illuminating it by the diverse knowledge discovered through study, said the Pope. Rome’s academic community came together for Vespers in St Peter’s on the third Thursday of Advent, meaning that it was also the only night of the year in which the “O Antiphon” invoking Christ as Sapientia – Wisdom – is sung.

When considered together with the Nativity scene in Bethlehem, the Pope said, this invocation points to the “provocative” paradox of Wisdom seen from a Christian perspective. From “the mouth of the Most High”, Wisdom “comes to lie in swaddling cloths in a manger”, the Holy Father explained.

This identification of Wisdom with the Baby Jesus struck a chord with students: “In today’s society when one thinks of wisdom, so often the last thing to come to mind is humility”, said Emanuele Vincent, who also studies law in Rome. “The way the Pope brought the two together was truly beautiful”.

Contrary to what many may think, Benedict XVI said, drawing near to Christ in the manger is not an obstacle to successful academic study. “Education is a way for me to express and share my faith”, said Jenna Hensby, a nursing student from Sydney. “Rather than a stumbling block, it’s actually a platform”.

Hensby participated in the Celebration as a member of the delegation that had come from Australia to pass on the Icon of Mary, Sedes Sapientiae, to a delegation from Africa, its next destination.

The handing over took place at the conclusion of Vespers, a “small symbol of an immense project: that of creating a new bridge of knowledge between Rome and Africa”, said motor sciences student Angela Tozzi, representing Rome’s university students in an address to the Pope. “Remembering that Mary walks with us in our university hallways calls us to place our talents at the service of humanity… to build a new civilization founded on love”.

At the end of the ceremony, the organ’s chords faded into the rhythm of African drums and song, symbolizing the progression of the pilgrimage. Afterwards Christine Tesch, who studies business in Brisbane, expressed the Australian delegation’s hope for the Icon’s journey in Africa: that it might serve as an inspiration in the development of both its “Catholic faith, which is so young and vibrant, and its growing education system”.

The gathering was therefore a chance for the young students to recognize the interrelatedness of a worldwide academic community of the faithful. It also shed light on John Paul II’s original sentiments in commissioning the Icon, as expressed at its presentation: “Every day you are committed to proclaiming, defending and spreading the truth…. Even in research on areas of life which seem quite far from faith, there is a hidden desire for truth and meaning” (Homily to University Teachers, 10 September 2000; L’Osservatore Romano English edition, 13 September, p. 1).

For Benedict XVI, it was an opportunity to invite his fellow academics to draw near to that Grotto in Bethlehem, in which lies the only answer to “the Christian paradox”: that with a “Love that infinitely exceeds human and historical dimensions”, the “Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (Jn 1:14).

© L’Osservatore Romano English edition 23/30 December 2009

“Never put off until tomorrow what you can do the day after tomorrow” – Mark Twain

Today I came across an Italian word I hadn’t heard before: improcrastinabile. It’s an adjective to describe something that simply cannot be put off any longer.  So maybe next time I’m procrastinating like mad, I’ll be able to tell myself that the task at hand is absolutely ‘unprocrastinatable’ and just get on with it…. We’ll see! Italians love that as an answer to any kind of query, by the way. You’ll never get yes or no,  but rather  ”vediamo”. It’s the most non-committal way to respond, avoiding the issue while not bluntly refusing. In the end it’s just another way to put something off – in Italian rimandare, which literally means “send back”. Perhaps there’s a reason why it was just today that I first came across this “no procrastinating allowed” word. It’s not very commonly used.

Another tidbit of linguistic knowledge I recently stumbled upon is that, in bird watching lingo, “to dip out“ is to miss finding the bird you came to see, and “to grip off” is to see it and boast about it to others who didn’t. Who knows? Maybe some day the expressions will catch on our non-bird watching world. If the word “meh” has been universalized and accepted as a proper English term, then it seems feasible enough to me.    

When discussing American and Italian expressions, I’ve come to realize that many of the characteristically American ones often revolve around sports. Things like, “Can I get a rain check?” or “The ball is in his court now” or “That was a close call”, etc.  Reminds me of Runaway Bride, when Julia Robert’s fiance uses sports psychology in an attempt to prepare her to actually go through with the wedding ceremony. “Just keep your eye on the ball”…

Returning to the subject of films, my friend who lent me the Kingdom of Heaven DVD explained last night that they came out with several versions of the movie. Apparently the theatrical cut, at 144 minutes, got released sans plot or character development, whereas the longer director’s cut is supposed to be decent (189 min).  Or at least better, which sure wouldn’t be difficult!

Dos and don’ts

OK, I’m starting to get seriously worried. My gelateria has not been open now for more than 2 weeks. I know people go on Christmas vacation. And I’m happy to go without, knowing that the friendly people who run the place get a break. But we’re past the Epiphany now. Most people are back. If they haven’t reopened by next week, I’m not sure what I’ll do…

Watched the new Sherlock Holmes recently. Great fun – I highly recommend it, even if Sherlock doesn’t come across as, well, Sherlocky as one might imagine. More rough, less sophisticated perhaps, but just as clever. They definitely play up the action a good deal, (which also makes it more violent than you might expect) but it’s one of the most entertaining movies I’ve seen in a long time. And I went into the theatre sceptical on several counts. I’m not a fan of Robert Downey Jr. in the first place and couldn’t picture him as Sherlock even if I were, plus I wasn’t sure about Jude Law in the Watson role.  But I was hooked, beginning to end.

Sherlock Holmes

On the other hand, I started to watch Kingdom of Heaven on DVD with a friend of mine, and we had to turn it off it was so bad. I was surprised with such a star-studded cast that it could be that disappointing. It features Liam Neeson, Eva Green, Orlando Bloom, Jeremy Irons and the list goes on. Same director as The Gladiator. But there was almost no plot. And I found myself not caring an ounce about what happened to any of them. Never a good sign.

I may as well alternate. Another thing I would recommend, if you’re looking for a fun read and love Italian culture, is Evening Class by Maeve Binchy. Lots of interconnected plot lines and likeable, well-developed characters.

Re-touristing

Happy New Year! How odd to think we’ve entered into the double digits. What will this decade be called, though? And the one we’ve just finished? This past one has no “-ies” to it, like the nineties or twenties did, and the one we’ve just begun only has the teens to clump it together. But that’s never used when we talk about the 20th century.  What will the CDs be called with the music from this past decade? Hits of the Zeros? Hmm. According to the ever authoritative Wikipedia, “the 2000s have not yet attained a universally accepted name in the English-speaking world”.  ”The noughties” has been proposed. While clever and almost cute, I’m not convinced. We’re gonna have to keep thinking, folks.

Last weekend I made it back to the same Museums where I had attended the music event before.  While my second visit to the Capitoline Museums may have lacked the concert pianist and TV coverage of the last, the art was even more beautiful in the sunlight streaming through the palace’s huge windows. Every inch of that place is worth observing, from the ornate ceilings and grandeur staircases, to the mosaic floors, to the inscriptions of centuries of Roman history on the walls – not to mention all of the artifacts and sculptures and paintings! Speaking of that last visit, it turns out that the mysterious broadcaster who interviewed me was from one of Italy’s major network channels: ‘I was watching the Sunday night news, and there you were!’, my landlord told me recently.

File:Lo Spinario.JPG

One of the main highlights of the Capitoline Museums is the original statue of the she-wolf with the two infants Romulus and Remus beneath her – the symbol of Rome.  The image is everywhere, but what I hadn’t known is that, though the statue of the wolf is thought to be from about the 5th century B.C., the children were added during the Middle Ages to correspond with the myth of the City’s founding.  Another fun fact is that the she-wolf has a hole in her right back leg, because she was struck by lightning back in 65 B.C.

Another highlight is Lo Spinario, a Hellenistic bronze sculpture of a small boy (c. 1st cent. B.C), concentrating hard on removing a thorn from the sole of his foot (at right).  The simplicity of it is what’s striking, especially amid so many rooms full of grandiose, dramatic depictions of people and events. Instead he’s captured carrying out a trivial, tedious act, but there’s something endearing about the contrast.

Although the museum is full of political history, and perhaps one of the least religiously themed tourist attractions you could visit in the Eternal City, the third floor has a decent amount of Christian artwork. My favorite is a depiction of the Holy Family, seen below. Joseph seems older than he is often portrayed, but I absolutely love the look on his face as he gazes at the baby Jesus.  And the detail… bellissimo.

Sacra Famiglia - Pompeo Batoni - Roma, Pinacoteca Capitolina

A heart of flesh

New article published today!

Excuse the bulky parenthetical footnotes but the formatting doesn’t transfer too well…

Unveiling the paradox of Christ’s love

“The birth of Jesus Christ in that stable in Bethlehem is where all my questions begin to be answered”.  The late Cardinal Basil Hume, Archbishop of Westminster, wrote these words when nearing the end of his life. “If I want to look on the face of utter love, if I want to see what the lover will do for the beloved, I have to take myself with faith to the crib and look at the image of the Child lying in the manger”, he added (1).

Looking at the scene of Christ’s birth – this is exactly what Benedict XVI invited the faithful to do when he blessed the Bambinelli that children had brought to the Angelus Reflection in St Peter’s Square on Sunday, 13 December.  He asked the “little ones” and their families to open their eyes to the mystery of this familiar scene of the Child Jesus and his Holy Family in the stable. In Italy the presepe, or nativity scene, remains the focus of Christmas decorations, with elaborate displays adorning piazzas and churches throughout the country.

As the Pope recalled, the tradition of the nativity scene began when St Francis of Assisi organized a re-enactment of the night of Christ’s birth in a mountainside cave in the small Italian village of Greccio:

“I want to do something that will recall the memory of that Child who was born in Bethlehem, to see with bodily eyes the inconveniences of his infancy”, St Francis explained during preparation for that first live nativity scene in 1223, as Thomas of Celano recorded in his biography of the Saint.

In that time, Thomas writes, “in the hearts of many the Child Jesus really had been forgotten, but, by his grace and through his servant Francis, he had been brought back to life”. What Francis most wanted to show the people, the Holy Father said on Sunday,  was that because of his love for us the Son of God emptied himself completely and came down to earth as a tiny baby.

The Nativity Scene at Greccio - a pretty, if not terribly accurate, depiction

The depth and nature of this love is a mystery that – while remaining hidden to many, past and present – has been revealed to the “little ones”.  Understanding the profound importance of this mystery and realizing what kind of person might begin to grasp it are both topics on which the Pope has consistently reflected, especially since the beginning of the new Liturgical Year.

“He concealed the great mystery of the Son… from the wise and the learned, from those who did not recognize him. Instead he revealed it to the children”, the Holy Father said. In order for our eyes to be opened, we need the grace to become small, he said. This is not to say, however, that the “becoming little” that is necessary for a deeper understanding of the faith means an abandonment of reason or a reversion to ignorance (2).

Instead, this process of becoming small involves the acknowledgement and consequent renouncement of the kind of foolishness that often leads to blind pride. All too often, people tend to think they “know everything” and see their own methods as “above God”.  In order to look at the Christ Child and truly see what lies there before him a man must open himself in humility, recognizing how little he is in comparison to the greatness of God. It is “precisely by accepting his own smallness… that he arrives at the truth” (3).

So we are to look to children for inspiration, the Pope says. A large part of what makes them worthy role models seems to be their ceaseless wonder at the world. “God speaks very gently to children, often without words…. Creation provides the vocabulary – leaves, clouds, flowing water, a shaft of light. It is a secret language, not to be found in books” (4).

Indeed, seeing God in nature is often how mankind has come to experience this same mystery whose truth is revealed in Christ.  In every age the beauty of Creation has brought Christians and non-Christians to catch a glimpse of that mystery.  One might begin with St Francis, so well known for his exuberant praise of God’s handiwork, as expressed in his Canticle of the Sun. But someone like Albert Einstein, for example, found transcendent meaning in Creation as well. His religion consisted in “a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind”, he said. And he also had an appreciation for the importance of being like children: “People do not grow old no matter how long we live. We never cease to stand like curious children before the great Mystery into which we were born”.

The greatest minds – from theologians to philosophers to scientists – have often concluded their life’s work with a sense that  what they know is, in the grand scheme of things, not much at all. St Thomas Aquinas is a prime example. His thought remains to this day an invaluable foundation upon which a considerable part of Catholic Doctrine firmly stands. Having produced a large body of theological and philosophical work, St Thomas reached a point late in his life when he decided to stop writing. This was prompted by a realization, as he described it, that all he had written seemed to him to be mere “straw”.

But the Baby Jesus was not to become a Man who spoke of his utter lack of wisdom. Instead, “slowly he grew to man’s estate, increasing in wisdom and grace before God and man, adding to the fruits of his knowledge by experience… growing conscious of the outward fabric of the universe which his own hands upheld”, writes English Dominican Bede Jarrett (5).

It is only with the realization of Jesus’ true identity, then, that the extent of his humility can even begin to be perceived. And it is this realization that lies at the very core of the mystery of the faith: “that at a given moment in history the Trinitarian God entered our history, as a man like us” (6).

Thus the Holy Father has asserted time and again that Christianity is no myth: “the Gospel is not a legend but the account of a true story…. Jesus of Nazareth is a historical figure” (7). By coming down to earth, God revealed a great deal of the mystery of his love.  But in illuminating this mystery, “he cannot help blinding me even while he enlightens me, not because of his limitations, but of mine…. In other words, just because God is infinite and I am finite, it is to be expected that everything that he tells me of himself, while increasing light, will increase darkness at the same time. In those countries where the sun is brightest, there are the deepest shadows; the very brilliance of the sun adds to the blackness of the shadow that it casts” (8).

An awareness of Jesus’ identity and his humility unveils what seem at first to be contradictions. The paradox of his life emerges – a life begun on a bed of hay and finished on a wooden cross. If Christ is truly King, why would he lower himself to that kind of existence? Why would he choose to place himself in such poor circumstances? A helpless child might be considered the very epitome of vulnerability.  But then, “to love at all is to be vulnerable”, as C.S. Lewis writes (9).

Christ knows the human condition inside out, but instead of exploiting humanity for its frailty, he chose to share in its trials. It was this loving desire that led him to dwell among us: “In becoming Man, the Lord himself wanted to love us with a heart of flesh!”, the Pope explained (10).

The moment in which that heart of flesh started beating, the course of human history was drastically changed.  Christ’s entrance into the world would bring a new intimacy to mankind’s relationship with its Creator, one that did not end when he ascended into Heaven. He is still present today: “God is here, he has not withdrawn from the world” the Pope said, explaining that this phrase constituted “the essential meaning of the word adventus” for Early Christians (11). He described the Advent Season as a chance to “pause in silence to understand a presence. It is an invitation to understand that the individual events of the day are hints that God is giving us”, signs of his love (12).

Yet Advent is also a time of anticipation. “The Lord is at hand!”, we heard during Sunday’s Liturgy in the Letter of St Paul – notably the very same “great scholar” who had become a “little one” and was hence able to perceive “the folly of God as wisdom” (13).This anticipation is expressed, for example, in the way that in Italy traditionally the Infant Jesus is not placed in the manger until Christmas. The tension between this sense of expectation and the divine presence that can be experienced today is in itself symbolic of the Christian journey.

The balance between them was illustrated poignantly in St Peter’s Square on Sunday. There in the centre of the piazza was the large, covered manger scene, soon to be unveiled.  But from the Square filled with the faithful, Baby Jesus figurines in hand, one could see the Virgin holding a newborn Child just to the right of the Basilica. Upon the mosaic, a work commissioned by Pope John Paul II,  are written the words: Totus Tuus – totally yours. Parallel to Mary and Jesus stood the Holy Father at his window, reminding the faithful that “the crib is a school of life, where we can learn the secret of true joy”. This consists “in giving oneself as a gift for others and in loving one another” as God loved humanity – completely.

For Christians, it is a joy rooted firmly in hope. Christ did not come only to share in the human condition, he came to sanctify it, to lift it to himself:  “Christ’s nativity places ‘in our hands’ the potential of personal participation in God’s sacred life and love in an endless progression” (14).  The sense of anticipation that comes with Advent is in fact reminiscent of humanity’s insatiable longing for union with its Creator, its waiting to return home to him.

This same Creator made himself a humble servant out of love for his creatures. It is the Christ Child, both vulnerable Infant and Almighty God, both ever present and near at hand, who makes possible “the hope of our salvation”. Such is the message that Benedict XVI has continually sought to convey. Thus whoever can look – through the eyes of a “little one” – at the nativity scene, welcoming the Baby within as the centre of their lives, will find both “the source of true joy” and “the heart of the world” (15).

Notes

1)    Cardinal Basil Hume, Mystery of the Incarnation, (London: Dartman, Longman and Todd, 1999), p. 10

2)    Cf. Benedict XVI, Homily During Mass for the Members of the International Theological Commission, 1 December 2009; L’Osservatore Romano English edition [ORE], 9 December, p. 6.

3)    Ibid.

4)    Text of a French catechetical document as cited by Cardinal Hume in his above-referenced work, p. 60.

5)    “Jesus Christ”, Bede Jarrett Anthology, ed. Jordan Aumann, O.P., (London: Aquin Press, 1961), p. 35.

6)    Benedict XVI, Homily During Mass for Members of the International Theological Commission; ORE, 9 December 2009, p. 6.

7)    Angelus Reflection, 6 December 2009; ORE, 9 December, p. 1.

Note: This latter description can be dangerous when taken alone, however. Many academics have reduced the “great mystery of Jesus, the Son made Man” into a historical Jesus, “a tragic figure; a ghost, not of flesh and blood; a man who stays in the tomb” (Homily, Mass for Members of the International Theological Commission).

8)    Bede Jarrett, op “Faith”, Bede Jarrett Anthology, p. 296.

9)    The Four Loves (London: Harcourt Brace, 1960), p. 111.

10) General Audience Catechesis, 2 December 2009; ORE, 9 December, p. 16.

11) Homily During First Vespers for the Beginning of Advent, 28 November 2009; ORE, 2 December, p. 7.

12)  Cf. ibid.

13) Benedict XVI, Homily During Mass for Members of the International Theological Commission; ORE, 9 December 2009, p. 6.

14) Bartholomew I, Patriarchal Proclamation Upon the Feast of Christmas 2008.

15)  Benedict XVI, Angelus Reflection, 13 December 2009; see p. 3.

© L’Osservatore Romano English edition, 16 December 2009

« Older entries